How to reflect on my own experiences with domestic violence and the simulation of help that our system of abuse claims offer, I regret the most sensitivity to today 's victims As the years pass, our domestic violence systems under the violence against the offer of Law Women (VAWA) less and less help to reward the most severely damaged, but increasing for those operating systems. Encounter a frightening number of victims of severe battery with the same story to tell, they have passed through the courts and things almost immediately received more bad for them. I experienced this myself, personally. An expansive annotated list of government and academic studies supporting these concerns is the "article; Awareness Month" of domestic violence; by Richard L. Davis.For twelve years, American taxpayers have supported VAWA and other domestic violence programs, which have become a $ 1 billion a year. Why not just keep an operation of this failure, but also to expand its influences and funding year after year? I believe that follow the same logic of our society 's affinity for instant satisfaction of food of "fast €. It's quick, easy to get and satisfies an immediate personal desire. However, that satisfaction is empty and short-term and often creates problems not intentional and for consumers unanticipated. Meanwhile the sellers make a fortune selling their product ineffective and often harmful. To keep the money rolling in, must actively promote them to keep people accept it, and volendolo believe is a good thing for all, without regard to the facts. To this end, every year we devote a whole month to promote violence against women that the law pretends to bring under proteggenti of appearance of women from abuse and service delivery to those who have suffered. Before the hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee, 19 July 2005 for riautorizzazione of VAWA, many people, including me, tried to tell our side about the failures of VAWA. Several scientists with decades of experience studying the dynamics of intimate partner violence also requested to testify at this hearing. But even after that run text ads out in the Washington DC based newspapers expressing our concerns, we were all denied time to speak at the hearing. Who testified? A legend of retired NBA basketball team, a star of cinema and a vice chairman of a holding of the aesthetic. If these are qualifications the U.S. Senate considers appropriate to ensure that someone as expert witnesses about VAWA, which invite to testify about violence on the main TV time? Some Tibetan monks perhaps? So what went wrong? The whole system pollutant with ideological propaganda, whose operation is abundant with fraud and real victims are nothing but tools for sale is intended to failure. Unless, what he perceived as a failure was designed, designed result. If misery loves company, then perhaps the success of VAWA has been to make sure the victims of extreme brutality households to have plenty of. The women of True Equality Network, most of whom are themselves victims of severe domestic violence, they spend nearly five years in courts intervistanti more than 15,000 plaintiffs in domestic violence cases just before they entered nell'aula court. The so overwhelming number of those interviewed did not attempt to mask the real reasons that have filed a complaint of domestic violence: control, money and "the € revengeâ of all you could possibly" of € imaginea of everything except acts of domestic violence . Subsequently, the real network of equality has asked prominent members of the counties in which the plaintiff surveys were conducted to interview the judges who hear these cases. Each of the judges interviewed confirmed the study 's results of the dominant levels of false complaints of domestic violence in their court. These judges also know them indicate that lawyers in the "â € of these cases, including" â € the recipients of Legal Services companies are subornando of perjury scripting the statements of women in these cases. They also expressed concern that their District Prosecutors were not pursuing these acts of fraud. The renowned professors and scientists who have examined this series of studies have said that studies were undertaken using scientific methods and have adjusted the product "… significant results that must be published and widely cited." Among those supporting this study is Dr. Don Dutton of the University of British Columbia, which is planning to duplicate this study in the Canadian legal system. By Dott. Dutton, numerous civil rights organizations have called on the network of real equality to produce a training manual to undertake these studies. With this tool, interviews of domestic violence plaintiffs are now leading in all 50 of the United States and begin soon in search of shelter for abuse Canada.Our discovered some disturbing activities. This includes guards engaged the services of prostitution, drug dealing, sheriff 's delegates from working as "protectors," and editors who organize the shelter to shelter to customers provide sexual favors to officials of the forces Police in exchange for the officers' false testimony in court. The current system is facing some concern or anyone bear. Then the helpers and what meaning? It is well known and reported that false allegations of domestic violence have long been the tactical weapon of choice to gain advantage in contested custody cases. This provides financial rewards not just to women but also the conditions with a broad alignment of the sources of federal funding. Many of these sources have nothing to do with domestic violence, such as reasons increased from federal funding of accumulation of your family for the children, from TANF, from HUD and many others, concerning the conditions tan reason to perpetuate the fraud as those who are truly committed. Two special reports from RADAR – respecting the accuracy in reporting of domestic abuse, is useful reading: "Reasons perverse, false allegations and Children" forgotten; describes the monetary motivators for the filing of false allegations of domestic violence and 'A' epidemic of abuse of civil rights: Post of States' Domestic Violence Laws "covers what conditions provide the biggest reasons for perpetrating these acts of fraud. The bottom line is: our system of support for abuse seems to support everything, unless severely abused. We are nothing but media fodder used to foster sufficient public guilt to keep the fraud constituted a fund. From the photos sfilanti of our bodies are damaged before the public and the Congress of domestic violence coalitions can keep the barrel full of hog. It doesn 't take a scholar to realize that if keystrokes in order to decrease may financing. That affected us acceptable and maybe even necessary losses.
Terri Lynn Tersak